Windows Vista vs OpenSUSE 11

Wed, Mar 10, 2010

Distros


Have you ever wondered how much memory does Windows Vista need to use Firefox 3? And how much does Linux?, in this case opensuse 11. Windows Vista with Aero enabled (and of course another few background programs that anyone normally use) just after rebooting. opensuse 11 running with KDE 4 and with Compiz Fusion enabled and other programs like cairodock and emesene. Hardware: Dell XPS m1530 Intel Core 2 Duo 1.6Ghz, 3gb Ram, NVIDIA8600 GT Music: Black Rebel Motorcycle Club – Cold Wind

Incoming search terms for the article:



Check this post too : urpmi, 10 fedora, programming capabilities of unix

, ,

25 Responses to “Windows Vista vs OpenSUSE 11”

  1. kota2223 Says:

    I personally prefer Gentoo. Excellent distro. I used to use OpenSUSE but I had an issue when installing Python 2. 6 and Python 3. 11 in parallel. Gentoo’s Portage allows a huge amount of flexibility, and I love the rolling releases.

    Reply

  2. hrbear Says:

    Can anyone tell if he has tried You Tube full screen videos in Linux with an Nvidia 8800? They say this card is running good. (I remind you not to install Flash 10. Everything goes mute. I went back to Flash 9).

    Reply

  3. hrbear Says:

    Try Opera in Linux. It’s far better than Firefox. There is Google Chrome now in Linux too. Opera is just excellent.

    Reply

  4. hrbear Says:

    but this is due to video card drivers. I have an older model of GeForce 6800. It’s a strong video card, the screen analysis I have is 1680 x 1050, and KDE by itself is very fast. Flash content use much CPU (like in windows). Don’t install Flash 10. You won’t have sound. Install Flash 9 instead. It’s enough fast.

    Reply

  5. hrbear Says:

    Try Open SUSE 11. 1 it’s very improved, it’s very good on plug n play, if you have some older PC or laptop model it recognises everything. I have it installed on an Asus deluxe with a P4 at 3 GHz, 3 Gb of memory it just recognised every device and connected to the net immediately (via ethernet port). It’s very fast in this machine. You can have many browser windows open, the connections are fast because the TCP-IP stack in Linux is better. It’s not as fast at full screen flash videos (You Tube)

    Reply

  6. antonij3 Says:

    Open Suse THE BEST but it is very SLOW,but theres no virus

    Reply

  7. codecaine Says:

    opensuse by far!

    Reply

  8. myspacecommassergio Says:

    . . . . sounds like your computer is slow becuase of hardware I have Vista, and my laptop overheats alot but in Linux Mint 8 its barely even warming up. . . still in Vista things run fast. I have AMD Turion x2 processor, 4GB ram, 128MB shared NVIDIA.

    Everything is fast for me in both Linux Mint and Vista. . . Opensuse is probably faster for u becuase it uses less resources and has lower requirments than Vista/Win7 does. . . Vista is a resource hog but with my system it runs fine and linux runs COOLER.

    Reply

  9. FedoraFTW Says:

    @Wolferine95 it’s slow because you prolly have a shitty computer.

    Reply

  10. Bullyfan1994 Says:

    you’re damn right, tomorrow i’m gonna install opensuse

    Reply

  11. Wolferine95 Says:

    OpenSuse Is TEh Best xD
    I Used To HAve Windows 7 But Its So Fvuckn Sllow
    And I swereed i won’t Use It Agian
    Lmaooooooooooooo

    Reply

  12. 420bmxer Says:

    welln witch os is he using as a host linux of windows?

    Reply

  13. Ne0nLiteZ Says:

    i hope to jesus christ you are joking about your whole comment :

    Reply

  14. 420bmxer Says:

    how did you switch from windows to linux so fast?

    say if i was to insall leopard on my PC could i use the same program?

    Reply

  15. neurom4nc3r Says:

    let the noobs dumbasses play around with their toys called windows seven and windows vista. The Linux boxes rocks, evar! so powerful, so light, so safe and so beautiful ;) what more u want?

    Reply

  16. TheWootmaster5000 Says:

    linux is the bomb and is better than windows 7 also

    Reply

  17. redeyednorn Says:

    stop asking to be fooled. . microsoft efficiently fools you with fancy desktop gadgets sayin’ how much RAM they’d like their OS to be spenting. .

    Say. . can YOUR 32-bit Vista manage more than 3GB??

    Reply

  18. shiznetlcd Says:

    yes and people should reallise that there are a whole freaking lot of programs that doesn’t need compiling or the terminal

    Reply

  19. GraphicAbility Says:

    lol xD

    Reply

  20. LLCoolPass Says:

    insuf iq

    Reply

  21. pmgodfrey Says:

    If you’re like me and have been involved with computers for the last 30+ years Linux will come naturally.

    The people who have a difficult time understanding Windows won’t be doing much better in Linux.

    I believe that people have a difficult time making the switch because they’re either dependant or familiar with their current applications. Many don’t know there is a Linux equivalent available. Why spend $350 for MS Office when Open Office is free?

    Reply

  22. MartinChir Says:

    First you had plenty of programs running in memory on the Windows machine, I could see them on the taskbar. . .

    Second Windows Vista caches memory so it can be used efficiently, it releases it when necessary & unused memory is wasted memory so you could say Suse with 1gb+ of memory is a waste.

    Reply

  23. rasiakwood Says:

    i use linux – but this just simply a lie. Firefox on linux is resource hog – it works milion times worse than on Vista. It doesnt mother how much ram it showing to use.

    Reply

  24. orapinglobal Says:

    vista dozznt use all ram u retard, it manages it efficiently. u wanna know how much ram is being used, start the cpu ram gadget.

    Reply

  25. exozero Says:

    what programs did u use?

    Reply


Leave a Reply